Drawing for CELAYA

USPTO serial 74337268

CELAYA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2082682Status 800Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 29, 1997
Examiner
GRAY, CAROLYN
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Status 800: Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection.

Need help with CELAYA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kristin H. Altoff

Kristin H. Altoff Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP1111 Pennsylvania Ave, NWAttn: TMSUWashington, DC 20004

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030[ coffee, tea, cocoa, sugar, rice, tapioca, sago, artificial coffee; flour and bread, pastry and confectionery; namely, candies, ] chocolate products; namely, [ candies, pastries, toppings, ] non-dairy beverages and powdered chocolate, [ ices; honey, treacle; yeast, baking powder; salt, mustard; vinegar, sauces (except salad dressings), spices, ice ]ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 29, 2026REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Aug 20, 2018CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Aug 20, 2018COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Aug 11, 2017NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Aug 11, 2017RNL2REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Aug 11, 201789AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Aug 11, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 5, 2017E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Jul 29, 2016REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
May 6, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 6, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 6, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 6, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 3, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Mar 9, 2007CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Oct 26, 2006RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Oct 26, 200689AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Oct 14, 2006PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Aug 9, 200689AFREGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED—
Aug 9, 2006E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Sep 20, 2003C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jul 21, 2003815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
Jul 21, 2003E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jul 29, 1997R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 6, 1997PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 4, 1997NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 6, 1996CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 19, 1996EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 9, 1996CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Apr 12, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 26, 1996CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 20, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 17, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 20, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 1, 1993CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 20, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 20, 19931.BDSec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED—
Mar 26, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 8, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 22, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance