USPTO serial 74337298
Serial No. 74337298
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEVINE, HOWARD B
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 74337298?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Saint-Lambert, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
A. YATES DOWELL, III
A YATES DOWELL III DOWELL & DOWELL PC1215 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWY STE 309ARLINGTON, VA 22202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | solutions for intra-articular injections to promote ligament, cartilage, or any soft tissue healing or remodeling | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | prostheses, ortheses, and implants for use in the musculo-skeletal system | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | consultation services related to research in the fields of orthopedics, of biomechanics, and of radiological and biological investigation in cases of idiopathic scoliosis | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 5, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 5, 1997 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 1996 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |