USPTO serial 74338212
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
BRITISH COLUMBIA, VICTORIA, CA
BRITISH COLUMBIA, VICTORIA, CA
Victoria, British Columbia, V8X 3Y1, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Laurinda L. Hicks
LAURINDA L HICKS TOWNSEND & BANTAP O BOX 27846WASHINGTON, DC 20038UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | CD-ROM featuring a data base comprised of resumes; and computer software for accessing and or managing a computer data base comprised of resumes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | storage of resumes in a computer data base for retrieval for use in the field of employment opportunities; and storage of resumes of others for accessing by potential employers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 2003 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 24, 1996 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 12, 1996 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 7, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 15, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 24, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 11, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |