USPTO serial 74338244
DOLPHIN SAFE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PRICE, JERRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DOLPHIN SAFE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edward R. Weingram
EDWARD R WEINGRAM WEINGRAM & ZALL197 W SPRING VALLEY RDP O BOX 927MAYWOOD, NJ 07607Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | seafood, namely shellfish, fish and fish roe | ABANDONED | Feb 12, 1992 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 1997 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 20, 1997 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 20, 1997 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 29, 1996 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 4, 1995 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 13, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 21, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 19, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 7, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 3, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 16, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 1994 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 15, 1993 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 1, 1993 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 3, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 21, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 1, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |