Drawing for ECOFILL

USPTO serial 74338392

ECOFILL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
STOIDES, KATHERINE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ECOFILL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ASLAN BAGHDADI

ASLAN BAGHDADI CROWELL & MORING1001 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004-2595UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
022polyester filling fibers used in the manufacture of cushions for the automobile industry, the furniture industry and similar industriesABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 23, 1998ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION
Feb 24, 1997ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Jan 21, 1997PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 20, 1996NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Oct 30, 1996CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 6, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 4, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 9, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 22, 1993CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Mar 12, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 1, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance