USPTO serial 74338622
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Junction City, OR
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James W. Clement
JAMES W CLEMENT CLEMENT AND RYAN135 S LA SALLE ST STE 1625CHICAGO, IL 60603UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | processed nuts, potato chips and onion rings | ABANDONED | — |
| 030 | dairy desserts; namely, ice cream, ice milk, frozen yogurt and sherbet; sorbet; flavored ices; non-dairy frozen dessert; namely, frozen custard; dairy and non-dairy frozen novelty confections; chewing gum; marshmallows; candied fruits; candied nuts; bakery products; namely, pies, cakes, sweet rolls, coffee cake, doughnuts, danish rolls and cookies; snack foods; namely, popped popcorn, corn and wheat based snack foods, cereal based snack foods; spice mixes for making dips; coffee and cocoa | ABANDONED | — |
| 032 | flavored soft drinks; and fruit juices | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 6, 1994 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 8, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 27, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |