USPTO serial 74338822
ONO-SENDAI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GLYNN, GERALD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ONO-SENDAI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William J. Egan, III
WILLIAM J EGAN III HELLER, EHRMAN, WHITE & MCAULIFFE333 BUSH STSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104-2878UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | electronic instrumentation; namely, television sets, video cameras, video monitors, stereos, video and audio remote controls, computer hardware and software related to electronic virtual reality systems, and sensory devices, for use with electronic virtual reality systems | ABANDONED | — |
| 028 | electronic reality games and toys; namely, video game cartridges, video game interactive controls, head-mounted-displays, head-tracking devices, hand-tracking devices, video game joysticks, video game machines, video output games, electric action toys, electronic dart games, computer game cartridges, computer game tapes, and virtual reality helmets and gloves | ABANDONED | — |
| 038 | communication transmissions services; namely, electronic transmission of data, documents, and messages related to electronic virtual reality systems | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | training services; namely, conducting training and educational programs using interactive electronic virtual reality systems, and providing instruction in the implementation and use of electronic virtual reality systems by dissemination of written materials, seminars, workshops and consultations | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | technical consultation, supervision, and inspection in the field of electronic virtual reality | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ono-Sendai Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Ono-Sendai Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ONO-SENDAI
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 1994 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| May 13, 1994 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 18, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 10, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 20, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |