USPTO serial 74339135
WELLBODY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SEEGARS, GERALD C.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WELLBODY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stanley W. Sokoloff
STANLEY W SOKOLOFF BLAKELY SOKOLOFF TAYLOR & ZAFMANSEVENTH FL12400 WILSHIRE BLVDLOS ANGELES, CA 90025Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | non-medicated hair care preparations, bath salts, skin cleansing creams, and skin care products; namely, moisturizers, facial scrubs, cleanser, skin gel, skin toner, and facial masque | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 1996 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 15, 1996 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 15, 1996 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 15, 1995 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 9, 1994 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 30, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 6, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 2, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 27, 1993 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 24, 1993 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 4, 1993 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 27, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 12, 1993 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |