USPTO serial 74339488
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas I. Rozsa
THOMAS I ROZSAIMPERIAL BANK BLDG STE 108115303 VENTURA BLVDSHERMAN OAKS, CA 91403| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | industrial and commercial air filtration machines for filtering, separating, compartmentalizal, removing, sorting out, concentrating one or more solid and/or liquid components from other components of a multi-component system, which can consist of solid, liquid, and gaseous components; pollution and particulate removal machines for filtering, separating, compartmentalizing, removing, sorting out, concentrating one or more solid or particulate components from other components of a multi-component systems, which can consist of solid, liquid, and gaseous components; and air and liquid filtrating machines for filtering, separating, compartmentalizing, removing, sorting out, concentrating one or more components from other components of a multi-component system, which can consist of solid, liquid, colloidal and gaseous components | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Aug 7, 1995 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 30, 1997 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Jan 30, 1997 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 13, 1997 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 8, 1996 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 19, 1995 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 27, 1995 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 27, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 22, 1995 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 30, 1995 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 7, 1995 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 27, 1994 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 13, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 14, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 8, 1994 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 1994 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 11, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 6, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 15, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |