USPTO serial 74340549
OPTICAL DIAMOND PRODUCTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1965995Status 713
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 2, 1996
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OPTICAL DIAMOND PRODUCTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J. BRUCE MCCUBBREY
OPTICAL DIAMOND PRODUCTS7331 WILLIAM AVE BLDG #24STE 900ALLENTOWN, PA 18106Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | coated optical lenses | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Oct 26, 1992 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 21, 2001 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Jun 19, 2001 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 31, 2001 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 23, 2000 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 2, 1996 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Dec 19, 1995 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 8, 1995 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 1995 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 26, 1995 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 1994 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 14, 1994 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 1994 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 1, 1994 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 21, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |