USPTO serial 74340656
ROCK ISLAND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TAYLOR, CRAIG
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ROCK ISLAND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas J. Moore
THOMAS J MOORE BACON & THOMAS625 SLATERS LN FOURTH FLALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | board games, puzzles and models | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | transportation services, namely railroad services and transporation of persons and goods by rail for others | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | restaurant and lodging services, namely hotel services, motel services, and bed and breakfast services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Maytag Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Maytag Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ROCK ISLAND
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 30, 1999 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 10, 1999 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 6, 1999 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 10, 1998 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 17, 1998 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 5, 1998 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 12, 1998 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 11, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 18, 1997 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Aug 18, 1997 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 18, 1997 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 1997 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 2, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 10, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 29, 1996 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 1995 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 25, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 18, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 12, 1994 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 10, 1994 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 8, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 1993 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 30, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 23, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 12, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |