USPTO serial 74340729
STEEL STRINGER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FISHER, HANNAH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with STEEL STRINGER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
New South Wales, 2103, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alan C. Rose
ALAN C ROSE POMS, SMITH, LANDE & ROSEPROFESSIONAL CORPORATION2029 CENTURY PARK E STE 3800LOS ANGELES, CA 90067-3024Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | reinforcing for surfboards formed of high-strength fibers bonded to plywood veneer | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 1, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 1994 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |