Drawing for TASTE THE DIFFERENCE CREATIVITY MAKES

USPTO serial 74340866

TASTE THE DIFFERENCE CREATIVITY MAKES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PITTS, AVALYN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TASTE THE DIFFERENCE CREATIVITY MAKES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard E. Alexander

RICHARD E ALEXANDER BULLWINKEL PARTNERS, LTD19 S LASALLE ST STE 1300CHICAGO, IL 60603UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001food antioxidants, food flavor enhancers, food flavor precursors (chemical added to precurse flavor without the presence of actual flavor), food flavor adjunctives (material providing separate effect from food flavor such as superior mouth feel)ABANDONED—
029selected dairy products; namely, cheese, whey, butter, buttermilk solids and blends thereofABANDONED—
030food flavors, not essential oils; food preservatives, not essential oils; emulsifiers for use in food products; and food flavor enhancersABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 29, 1995PCDEPETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED—
Aug 10, 1995PCRCPETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED—
Jul 13, 1995EX2MSOU EXTENSION 2 DENIAL LETTER MAILED—
Jul 13, 1995EX2DSOU EXTENSION 2 DENIAL LETTER PREPARED—
May 18, 1995ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 17, 1995EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 26, 1994EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 24, 1994EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 17, 1994NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 25, 1993PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 23, 1993NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 25, 1993CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 6, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance