USPTO serial 74340896
CELLTRACS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AWRICH, ELLEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CELLTRACS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Russell B. Miller
RUSSELL B MILLER QUALCOMM INCORPORATED10555 SORRENTO VALLEY RDSAN DIEGO, CA 92121-1617UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | mobile communications terminals and computer programs therefor; interface boards and software therefor, for interfacing a mobile communications terminal with a cellular telephone; interface boards and software therefor, for interfacing a mobile communications terminal with a personal communication device; cellular telephones and personal communication devices; computer programs for computers in the transportation industry for processing information received via mobile communications terminals, cellular telephones, or personal communications devices | ABANDONED | — |
| 038 | mobile communications services | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 25, 1997 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 10, 1997 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 24, 1997 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 13, 1996 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 22, 1996 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 3, 1996 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 24, 1996 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 27, 1995 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 22, 1995 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 24, 1995 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 1, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 30, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 20, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 20, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |