USPTO serial 74341165
GRAFFITI EST!EST!!EST!!! DI MONTEFIASCONE LUIGI BIGI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GRAFFITI EST!EST!!EST!!! DI MONTEFIASCONE LUIGI BIGI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
GRUPPO ITALIANO VINI S.C. A R.L.
37010 CALMASINO DI BARDOLINO (Verona), IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard C. Harris
RICHARD C HARRIS STEVENS, DAVIS, MILLER & MOSHER515 N WASHINGTON STP O BOX 1427ALEXANDRIA, VA 22313Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | wines, spirits and liqueurs | ABANDONED | Jul 16, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 4, 1996 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 16, 1996 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 16, 1996 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jul 7, 1995 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 1995 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 25, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 22, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |