USPTO serial 74341934
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
United China Electronics (Hong Kong) Co. Ltd.
Fo Tan, Shatin, N.T. Kowloon, HK
Other trademarks owned by United China Electronics (Hong Kong) Co. Ltd.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marguerite L. Gunn
MARGUERITE L GUNN KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR LLP2040 MAIN ST 14TH FLIRVINE, CA 92614UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | electrical and audio products; namely, cassette recorders, cassette players with earphones, car stereos, car speakers, radios, loud speakers, televisions, clock radios, L.E.D. (light Emitting Diode) lamps, diodes, zener diodes, A.F.C. (Automatic Frequency Control) diodes, transistors, ceramic capacitors, resistors, electrolytic capacitors, crystals, antennae, volume controls, slide variable resistors, buzzers, subwoofers, tweeters, and parts thereforxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 5, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 1995 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 10, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 12, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 16, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 1994 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 2, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 1994 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 16, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |