USPTO serial 74342334
ROTOCODE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MILTON, PRISCILLA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ROTOCODE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
North York, Ontario, M6B 2V4, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES R LAKE
JAMES R LAKE RIDOUT & MAYBEE1 QUEEN ST E STE 2400TORONTO, ON M5C 3B1CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | writing ink, invisible/writing ink, diaries, calendars, desk pads, envelopes, writing paper, greeting cards, looseleaf binders, souvenir books, clip boards, crayons, erasers, pencil cases, pencil boxes, drawing instruments, drawing templates, note pads, decals, placemats made of paper, book and instructional manuals for coding and decoding written messages, boards for coding and decoding written messages | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 18, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 17, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 3, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 22, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 27, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 2, 1994 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 2, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 6, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |