Drawing for FLORAL PLUS

USPTO serial 74342667

FLORAL PLUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUTLER, MIDGE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FLORAL PLUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kathleen A. Segmiller

KATHLEEN A SEGMILLER1040 5TH AVE BLDGPITTSBURGH, PA 15219UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042wholesale distributorship of floral products; namely, flowers or plantsABANDONEDSep 1, 1987

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 28, 1996ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Mar 21, 1996CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 6, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 19, 1995CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 18, 1995ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 18, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 19, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 27, 1994PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 26, 1994NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 31, 1994CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 26, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 22, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 22, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 9, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance