USPTO serial 74342689
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Roseville, New South Wales, AU
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joan Kupersmith Larkin
JOAN KUPERSMITH LARKIN SMALL, LARKIN, KIDDE & GOLANT10940 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 1800LOS ANGELES, CA 90024UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | in-vitro diagnostic test kits consisting primarily of diagnostic preparations for medical purposes; diagnostic test kits consisting primarily of diagnostic preparations designed to detect the presence of bacterial contaminants in food stuffs; and similar kits for detection of bacterial contaminants in the environment; all for clinical and laboratory use | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 22, 1995 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Nov 15, 1995 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 18, 1995 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 1994 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 20, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 24, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 10, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |