USPTO serial 74342741
DURKEE SCREAMING HOT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEETZOW, KAREN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DURKEE SCREAMING HOT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Deborah Bailey-Wells
DEBORAH BAILEY-WELLS LIMBACH & LIMBACH2001 FERRY BLDGSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | dry seasoning mixes | ABANDONED | Jan 10, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 14, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 10, 1995 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 2, 1995 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 12, 1995 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 11, 1995 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 16, 1994 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 24, 1994 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 16, 1994 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 12, 1994 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 12, 1993 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 20, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 18, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 3, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 19, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 10, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |