USPTO serial 74342778
Serial No. 74342778
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 27, 1998
- Examiner
- DUNN, ELIZABETH A
- Law office
- OFFICE OF PUBLIC RECORD - SPECIAL HANDLING
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with Serial No. 74342778?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gunnar G. Leinberg, Esq.
Gunnar G. Leinberg, Esq. Nixon Peabody, LLP100 Clinton SquareRochester, NY 14604UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | reflective articles; namely, belts, trim, badges, armbands, legbands, shoulder bands, waistbands, gloves, mitts, discs, sashes, hats, helmets, headbands, patches, wristbands and watch straps for personal wear; decals and strips for life jackets, life buoys, life belts, life vests, life rafts and life boats, free-standing reflectors and warning triangles; and bands for placement on posts, barrels and cones used on roadways, all for protection against accidents or for location purposes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 017 | reflective plastic sheet material sold in roll form, sheet form and strip form for use in the manufacture of belts, decals, strips, bands, tags and the like | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 8, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 8, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2005 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 21, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 1998 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Aug 24, 1998 | CNSR | ALLOWED SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 21, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 15, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 3, 1997 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 3, 1997 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 3, 1997 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| May 10, 1997 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 11, 1996 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 6, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 6, 1996 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 3, 1996 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 3, 1996 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 14, 1995 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 30, 1995 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 12, 1995 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 1, 1995 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 20, 1994 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 10, 1994 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 10, 1994 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 27, 1994 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 27, 1994 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 3, 1994 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 4, 1993 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 8, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 7, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 24, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 16, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |