USPTO serial 74342784
MAGNALINK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CATALDO, PETER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MAGNALINK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles E. Weinstein
CHARLES E WEINSTEIN FOLEY, HOAG & ELIOTONE POST OFFICE SQBOSTON, MA 02109UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer hardware; namely, remote bridges and internetworking data compressors and instruction manuals sold as a unit therewith | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 10, 1995 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 10, 1995 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 10, 1995 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 6, 1994 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 9, 1993 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 10, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 4, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 4, 1993 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 30, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 22, 1993 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 1, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 1993 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 2, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |