USPTO serial 74343164
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha
Minato-ku, Tokyo 107, JP
Other trademarks owned by Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James J. Short
JAMES J SHORT JAMES J SHORT, PC1224 JOURNEYS ENDLA CANADA, CA 91011UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | devices such as a secondary master cylinder, a proportional control valve and multi-pistonned calipers for proportioning stopping force between front and rear wheel brakes on motorcycles | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 1996 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 1, 1996 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 24, 1995 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Sep 2, 1994 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 1994 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 11, 1994 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 11, 1994 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 28, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 27, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |