USPTO serial 74343478
CARINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TAYLOR, CRAIG
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CARINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
76420 BIHOREL-les-ROUEN, FR
76420 BIHOREL-les-ROUEN, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Barbara S. Ianniello
BARBARA S IANNIELLO WILLKIE FARR & GALLAGHERTHREE LAFAYETTE CTR1155 21ST ST NW STE 600WASHINGTON, DC 20036-3302Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | cleaning preparations and perfumery; namely, toilet soap; perfumes; ethereal oils; namely, essential oils for personal use; cosmetic products; namely, mascara, eyeliner, blushes, milk lotions and creams and lotions for the skin, skin cleansing creams and lotions, make-up and eye make-up removers, facial masks, facial cleansers, non-medicated hair care preparations | ABANDONED | — |
| 018 | luggage; namely, attache cases, billfolds, briefcases, credit card cases, business card cases, calling card cases, cosmetic bags sold empty; garment bags for traveling; handbags, knapsacks, passport cases, portfolios, purses, rucksacks, suitcases, toiletry cases sold empty, trunks for traveling | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 1997 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 23, 1996 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 28, 1996 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Aug 28, 1996 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| May 21, 1996 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 28, 1996 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 1996 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 23, 1995 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 22, 1995 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 29, 1995 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 29, 1995 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 17, 1995 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 17, 1995 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 1994 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 28, 1994 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 31, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 1, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 27, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |