Drawing for BIG DOG

USPTO serial 74343798

BIG DOG

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TAYLOR, JYLL
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BIG DOG?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kurt Koenig

Kurt Koenig Koenig & AssociatesPO Box 1140Summerland, CA 93067UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041entertainment services in the nature of continuing animated television programs and radio programs featuring musicABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 1, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 1, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 14, 2008ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jul 26, 1997ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 28, 1997EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 10, 1997EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 11, 1996EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 12, 1996EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 8, 1996EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 25, 1996EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 25, 1995NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 13, 1993PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 12, 1993NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 30, 1993CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 22, 1993CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Apr 2, 1993CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 17, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance