USPTO serial 74343881
AURA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARMINE, F. D.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AURA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
West Sussex BN1 2RX, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul A. Welter
PAUL A WELTER MERCHANT, GOULD, SMITH, EDELL, ET AL3100 NORWEST CTR90 S SEVENTH STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | amplifiers, tuners, compact disc players and loudspeakers for use in the field of home entertainment | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 1999 | PRRD | PETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST DENIED | — |
| Sep 25, 1998 | PRRR | PETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 1998 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Jun 8, 1998 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 11, 1997 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 1996 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 12, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |