USPTO serial 74344021
CASABLANCA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2306760Status 790Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 11, 2000
- Examiner
- SHAW, THOMAS V
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with CASABLANCA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Santiago, CL
SANTIAGO, CL
Santiago, CL
SANTIAGO, CL
SANTIAGO, CL
Santiago, CL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHARLES GORENSTEIN
CHARLES GORENSTEIN BIRCH, STEWART, KOLASCH & BIRCH, LLP8110 GATEHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 100 EASTFALLS CHURCH, VA 22042UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | wines | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Vina SANTA CAROLINA S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by VINA CASABLANCA S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by Vina SANTA CAROLINA S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by VIÑA CASABLANCA S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by VINA SANTA CAROLINA S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by Vina SANTA CAROLINA S.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named CASABLANCA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 2026 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 2, 2019 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2019 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 2, 2019 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Mar 2, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 30, 2019 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2019 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 11, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 25, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Dec 7, 2009 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Dec 2, 2009 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 19, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 3, 2006 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2006 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 3, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 11, 2000 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 2, 1999 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Aug 10, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 18, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 16, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 21, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 4, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 22, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 9, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 12, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 1, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |