USPTO serial 74345616
VALENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TAYLOR, CRAIG
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VALENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Martin R. Greenstein
MARTIN R GREENSTEIN BAKER & MCKENZIE660 HANSEN WAYP O BOX 60309PALO ALTO, CA 94306-0309Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computers, computer hardware, computer peripherals, and computer software in the nature of an operating system and related utility programs sold in conjunction therewith, and instructional books and manuals distributed therewith | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 1993 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 18, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 8, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 19, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |