USPTO serial 74347567
EPITRANS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, LAURA E
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EPITRANS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | drug delivery devices; namely, patches for transdermal delivery of medicaments through the skin; devices which partially or completely remove the stratum corneum layer of the skin by abrasion or peeling off of the appropriate layer upon abrasive or adhesive contact therewith for the purpose of improved transdermal drug delivery and the applicant requests registration in respect of such wares | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 18, 1994 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Sep 8, 1994 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 22, 1994 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 17, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |