USPTO serial 74350351
C:TEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, ANDREW D
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with C:TEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephanie Schrimpf Thomson
STEPHANIE SCHRIMPF THOMSON DINSMORE & SHOHL1900 CHEMED CTR255 E FIFTH STCINCINNATI, OH 45202-4719Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | telephones and radio pocket pagers | ABANDONED | — |
| 036 | brokerage of personnel communication services as long distance telephone services | ABANDONED | — |
| 038 | electronic voice messaging, namely, the recording, storage and subsequent transmission of voice messages by telephone | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Custom Telecommunications, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Custom Telecommunications, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named C:TEL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 1997 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 18, 1997 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 17, 1997 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 8, 1995 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 20, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 19, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 23, 1994 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 27, 1994 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 21, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 1, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 11, 1993 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 26, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 21, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |