Drawing for NEWVISION CENTERS

USPTO serial 74351087

NEWVISION CENTERS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
TAYLOR, CRAIG
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NEWVISION CENTERS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035franchising services; namely, providing technical advice and assistance in the establishment and/or operation of ophthalmologic centersABANDONED
042ophthalmology services; namely, providing laser surgery to treat nearsightedness, farsightedness and other vision deficienciesABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 11, 1995ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
May 11, 1995EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Oct 25, 1994EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Jun 28, 1994EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Nov 3, 1993CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 20, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 21, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 6, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 2, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance