USPTO serial 74352606
TRACKING INDUSTRY PROSPECTIVE SALES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TINGLEY, JOHN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TRACKING INDUSTRY PROSPECTIVE SALES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software and database programs for locating current or prospective projects in the construction industry | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by IBEW Local Union 117, 150, 461 and 701, and the Northeastern Illinois Chapter NECA Labor Management Cooperation Committee
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named TRACKING INDUSTRY PROSPECTIVE SALES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 29, 1995 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 29, 1995 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 29, 1995 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Mar 31, 1995 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 1994 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 1994 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 31, 1994 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 24, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 15, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 13, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |