USPTO serial 74353021
THE DELTA CAFE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUSH, KAREN K
- Law office
- OFFICE OF THE SOLICITOR
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE DELTA CAFE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gary N. Speed
GARY N SPEED ROSE LAW FIRM120 E FOURTH STLITTLE ROCK, AR 72201UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | restaurant services specializing in southern style cuisine | ABANDONED | May 5, 1992 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 29, 1997 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 29, 1997 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 23, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 5, 1995 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Feb 27, 1995 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 1994 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 6, 1994 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 31, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |