Drawing for LEAD BLOCK

USPTO serial 74353551

LEAD BLOCK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DUBOIS, SUSAN L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LEAD BLOCK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Eric O. Haugen

ERIC O HAUGEN HAUGEN AND NIKOLAI, PA820 INTERNATIONAL CTR900 SECOND AVE SMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-3325

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
002latex-based lead encapsulation paint used to seal surfaces painted with lead paintABANDONEDFeb 8, 1993

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 19, 1994ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Feb 7, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 12, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 23, 1993CNRUDISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED—
May 19, 1993AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 14, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 30, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 16, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 14, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 14, 1993IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance