Drawing for VAT

USPTO serial 74353664

VAT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SANTOMARTINO, MARTHA L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VAT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software which permits manipulation, display, and printing of respondent verbatim answers to open-ended survey questionsABANDONEDJul 24, 1992

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 13, 1995PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED
Aug 17, 1995PETLCOMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER
Aug 8, 1995PILMPETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED
Jan 17, 1995PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Feb 28, 1994ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 10, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 9, 1993CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 18, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 23, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 15, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance