USPTO serial 74354664
HENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HENDERSON, KEITH L.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Richmond, BC V7C 4R5, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George L. Wong
GEORGE L WONG244 CANAL STNEW YORK, NY 10013UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | clothing; namely, shirts, dresses, evening dresses, skirts, socks, blouses, jerseys, cardigans, pants, suits, sweaters, T-shirts, sweat shirts, sweat pants, jeans, vests, shorts, blazers, coats, jackets; swimwear; namely, bathing suits and lounge jackets; lingerie; namely, bras, panties, briefs, boxer shorts, slips, camisoles, chemises, nightgowns, pajamas, garter belts, teddies (one piece undergarments which snaps in the center) pantyhose, stockings, and slippers; aerobic wear; namely, tank tops, tights, leotards, briefs, cycling shorts, track suits, sweat bands and head bands | ABANDONED | Jul 15, 1992 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 8, 1994 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jun 24, 1994 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Apr 7, 1994 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 1994 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 7, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 1993 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 19, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 16, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |