USPTO serial 74355660
KIK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 607
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUTLER, MIDGE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KIK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Carl R. Brown
CARL R BROWN BROWN, MARTIN, HALLER & MCCLAIN1660 UNION STSAN DIEGO, CA 92101UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 2003 | ABN7 | ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Jul 8, 2003 | IUFF | USE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES | — |
| Dec 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 7, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 8, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 6, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 7, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 7, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 5, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 7, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 7, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 7, 1999 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 7, 1999 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 5, 1996 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 4, 1996 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 3, 1994 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 12, 1994 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 14, 1994 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 21, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 2, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 22, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |