USPTO serial 74355720
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
North Bergen, NJ
North Bergen, NJ
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roxanne Beausoleil
ROXANNE BEAUSOLEIL DARBY & DARBY PC805 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | electric appliances; namely, food blenders, hand-held food blenders, knives, coffee grinders, fruit and vegetable peelers, can openers and knife sharpeners, for household use, hand mixers, mixing machines, food choppers, can openers, coffee and pepper grinders, combination can opener and knife sharpeners and electric slicers; electric juicers | ABANDONED | — |
| 008 | forks, spoons, knives, hand tongs, non precious metal nut crackers, hand operated slicers, non-electric multi-purpose vegetable stringer/slicers | ABANDONED | — |
| 009 | digital food scales, egg timers, electric irons, electric vacuum cleaners, vacuum cleaner hoses, and measuring spoons | ABANDONED | — |
| 011 | electric appliances; namely, electric kettles, electric frying pans, skillets, woks, bread makers, steamers, cookers, coffee makers, coffee percolators, deep fryers, toasters, toaster ovens, cappuccino and espresso machines, barbecue grills, hot pots, cup warmers, hot plates, popcorn poppers, sandwich makers, and simmers; heat bag-sealers | ABANDONED | — |
| 021 | cutting boards, food storage containers, frying tongs, kitchen ladles, mixing cups, bowls, cups, household utensils, namely spatulas, and scoops; pepper grinders | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 1998 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 1, 1997 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 27, 1997 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 2, 1997 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 14, 1997 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 7, 1996 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 29, 1996 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 20, 1996 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 7, 1996 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 30, 1996 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 14, 1995 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 16, 1995 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 13, 1994 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 19, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 28, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 21, 1994 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 1994 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 30, 1994 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 15, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 28, 1994 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 21, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |