Drawing for DIAMOND PACIFIC

USPTO serial 74355895

DIAMOND PACIFIC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUSH, KAREN K
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DIAMOND PACIFIC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John Joseph Hall

1631 BEVERLY BLVDLOS ANGELES, CA 90026UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007motor driven lapidary machines capable of cutting and polishing only hand-held gem stones other than diamonds and only in a cabochon or rounded shapeABANDONEDOct 12, 1992

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 2, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 27, 1998EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 27, 1997ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 27, 1996EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jan 23, 1995CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Sep 28, 1994EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 22, 1994CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 8, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 10, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 21, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance