USPTO serial 74355995
SCARF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RUPP, TERRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SCARF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
4000 Dusseldorf 13, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WILLIAM F LAWRENCE
WILLIAM F LAWRENCE FROMMER LAWRENCE & HAUG LLP745 FIFTH AVENEW YORK, NY 10151UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | toiletries; namely, perfumes and colognes; essential oils for personal use; cosmetics; namely, lipsticks, mascara, non-medicated skin care preparations, skin tanning preparations, non-medicated skin protective preparations; hair waving lotion, hair styling preparations, hair rinses, hair dressings for men; toilet soap, skin soap and deodorant soap | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 7, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 9, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 9, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |