USPTO serial 74356214
PEP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KING, CHRISTINA B
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PEP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Castle Rock, CO
Castle Rock, CO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Frank H. Andorka
FRANK H ANDORKA3200 NATIONAL CITY CTRCLEVELAND, OH 44114UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | vitamin and nutrient-based food bars | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 31, 1995 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 24, 1995 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 31, 1995 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 31, 1995 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Sep 12, 1994 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 19, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 19, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 20, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |