USPTO serial 74356464
GREENBLOCK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2443525Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 10, 2001
- Examiner
- KHAN, ASMAT A
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with GREENBLOCK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
JENSEN BEACH, FL
Carmel, CA
Carmel, CA
NAPLES, FL
Port St. Lucie, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
B. CRAIG KILLOUGH
B. Craig Killough BARNWELL WHALEY PATTERSON & HELMS, LLCP.O. DRAWER HCHARLESTON, SC 29402UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | building insulation sold in block form | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GREENBLOCK WORLDWIDE CORP.
- Other trademarks owned by PRUSS, DONALD
- Other trademarks owned by PRUSS, DONALD
- Other trademarks owned by THREE VISIONARIES, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Greenblock Worldwide, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Similar marks named GREENBLOCK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2021 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Apr 10, 2020 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 28, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2011 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Aug 27, 2011 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Aug 25, 2011 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Dec 19, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2001 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jan 16, 2001 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 27, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 1, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 26, 1998 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 24, 1997 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 1997 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 23, 1997 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 17, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 1994 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Oct 19, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |