Drawing for BESTSELLERS

USPTO serial 74356487

BESTSELLERS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JEFFRIES, STEPHEN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BESTSELLERS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Vincent M. Amberly

VINCENT M AMBERLY NATH, AMBERLY & ASSOCIATES1835 K ST N WSTE 750WASHINGTON, DC 20006-1203

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041programming of television shows marketing current popular culture merchandise; anemly, video tapes, audio products, such as cassettes, compact disks, laser disks, seasonal calendars, nintendo-type video software, board games, CD interactive mini disks, digital compact cassettes, digital audio tapes, stuffed animals, clothing, food and beverages and furnitureABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 11, 1995EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 11, 1995ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 11, 1995EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Sep 28, 1994EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 4, 1994CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 24, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 24, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 23, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance