USPTO serial 74356487
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Vincent M. Amberly
VINCENT M AMBERLY NATH, AMBERLY & ASSOCIATES1835 K ST N WSTE 750WASHINGTON, DC 20006-1203| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | programming of television shows marketing current popular culture merchandise; anemly, video tapes, audio products, such as cassettes, compact disks, laser disks, seasonal calendars, nintendo-type video software, board games, CD interactive mini disks, digital compact cassettes, digital audio tapes, stuffed animals, clothing, food and beverages and furniture | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 1995 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 11, 1995 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 11, 1995 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Sep 28, 1994 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 4, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 24, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |