USPTO serial 74356599
SUNCARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SALEMI, DOMINICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SUNCARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mavis S. Gallenson
MAVIS S GALLENSON LADAS & PARRY5670 WILSHIRE BLVD21ST FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90036Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | cosmetics, namely skin emollient use as a mask | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 3, 1996 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 1995 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 1995 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 1994 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 18, 1994 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 26, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 8, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 26, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |