Drawing for APARTMENT GUIDE VIDEO

USPTO serial 74357657

APARTMENT GUIDE VIDEO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LYKOS, ANGELA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with APARTMENT GUIDE VIDEO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

BAILA H CELEDONIA

BAILA H CELEDONIA COWAN LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN PC1133 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-6799UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009audiovideo tapes distributed periodically, providing a directory for apartment shoppers and providing an advertising medium for apartment ownersABANDONED—
035promoting the services of the multi-family housing industry through the distribution of printed and audio promotional materials and by rendering sales promotion adviceABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 23, 1998ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Aug 3, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 6, 1998CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 11, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 6, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 8, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 12, 1996CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 2, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 6, 1994CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 1, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 3, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 6, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 25, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 7, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 3, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance