Drawing for APARTMENT GUIDE VIDEO

USPTO serial 74357658

APARTMENT GUIDE VIDEO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RADEMACHER, APRIL LUEDERS
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with APARTMENT GUIDE VIDEO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

BAILA H CELEDONIA

BAILA H CELEDONIA COWAN LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN PC1133 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-6799UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009audiovideo tapes distributed periodically, providing a directory for apartment shoppers and providing an advertising medium for apartment ownersACTIVE—
035promoting the services of the multi-family housing industry through the distribution of printed and audio promotional materials and by rendering sales promotion adviceACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 20, 2001ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Feb 10, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 21, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 4, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 20, 1998UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 14, 1998CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 6, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 15, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 1, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 7, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 28, 1996CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 2, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 6, 1994CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 1, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 3, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 18, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 18, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 27, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance