Drawing for APARTMENT GUIDE VIDEO

USPTO serial 74357659

APARTMENT GUIDE VIDEO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ATCHISON, ALAN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with APARTMENT GUIDE VIDEO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

BAILA H CELEDONIA

BAILA H CELEDONIA LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN PC1133 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-6799UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009audiovideo tapes distributed periodically, providing a directory for apartment shoppers and providing an advertising medium for apartment ownersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 31, 2000ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jan 24, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 4, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 14, 1998CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 6, 1997UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 15, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 8, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 28, 1996CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 2, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 6, 1994CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 1, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 15, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 7, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 6, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 2, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 7, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 3, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance