USPTO serial 74357774
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Lomas De Chapultepec, MX
Lomas De Chapultepec, MX
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Barry A. Cooper
BARRY A COOPER GOTTLIEB, RACKMAN & REISMAN, PC270 MADISON AVENEW YORK, NY 10016UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | toys for infants and children; namely, dolls and accessories therefor, doll costumes, doll cases, board games, building blocks, stuffed animals, balls, skate boards, toy cars, baby multiple-activity toys, baby rattles, toy banks, bath toys, snow sleds for recreational use, crib toys, crib mobiles, swim floats for recreational use, kites and parts therefor, marbles, musical toys, paper face masks, jigsaw puzzles, ride-on-toys, jump ropes, toy scooters | ABANDONED | — |
| 029 | dairy and preserved foods; namely, applesauce, processed fruits, processed vegetables, yogurt, milk, cream cheese, cheese food, dairy-based food beverages, vegetable-based food beverages, fruit-based snack food, gelatins, jams, jelly, marmalade, fruit preserves, fruit sauces, fruit topping, peanut butter | ABANDONED | — |
| 030 | breakfast cereals, processed cereals, ready-to-eat cereal-derived food bars, cereal-based snack food, granola, granola-based snack bars, ice cream, ice milk, oatmeal, puddings, rice-based snack foods, wheat-based snack foods | ABANDONED | — |
| 032 | colas, fruit juice concentrates, fruit-flavored soft drinks, fruit juices, aerated fruit juices, fruit punch, lemonade, soda water, seltzer water, carbonated soft drinks, non-carbonated soft drinks | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 15, 1998 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 20, 1998 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 23, 1998 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 9, 1997 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 30, 1997 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 17, 1997 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 28, 1997 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 30, 1996 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 29, 1996 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 15, 1996 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 1, 1996 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 31, 1995 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 8, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 7, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 18, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 20, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 6, 1995 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |