Drawing for SAFE PHONE ZONE

USPTO serial 74358160

SAFE PHONE ZONE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RAUEN, JAMES
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SAFE PHONE ZONE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christine S. Peterson

CHRISTINE S PETERSON KIRKLAND & ELLIS200 E RANDOLPH DRCHICAGO, IL 60601UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041educational services; namely, conducting classroom instruction in the field of cellular phone safety and distributing course materials in connection therewithABANDONEDNov 7, 1992

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 8, 1994ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Mar 14, 1994CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 13, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 8, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 14, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance