Drawing for THE ORIGINAL VINCENT'S ESTABLISHED 1904

USPTO serial 74358685

THE ORIGINAL VINCENT'S ESTABLISHED 1904

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HERSHKOWITZ, MERYL
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with THE ORIGINAL VINCENT'S ESTABLISHED 1904?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Courtney Jackson

Courtney Jackson Armstrong Teasdale, LLP7700 Forsyth Blvd., Ste. 1800St. Louis, MO 63105UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042restaurant servicesABANDONEDJul 21, 1992

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 1, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 1, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 26, 2004OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jul 26, 2004OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
May 21, 2003OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Apr 24, 2003ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Mar 26, 2003OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Sep 30, 2002ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Sep 30, 2002OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Sep 20, 2002ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jul 19, 1995OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
May 31, 1995OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 30, 1995PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 28, 1995NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 12, 1995CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 19, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 20, 1994CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 25, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 26, 1994CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 24, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 2, 1993CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 24, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 30, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance